Extended Follow-up of ALPINE Study Confirmed Superior PFS Benefit of Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in R/R CLL/SLL

In a head-to-head comparison of 2 Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors zanubrutinib and ibrutinib in the randomized, phase 3 ALPINE study (NCT03734016), primary analysis demonstrated superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR), accompanied by favorable safety/tolerability profile, in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).1 Results of an extended follow-up analysis (follow-up: 3 years) were reported at the 2023 American Society of Hematology annual meeting and summarized here.

The ALPINE study enrolled patients with R/R CLL/SLL, who received ≥1 prior therapy, and had measurable disease. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive zanubrutinib or ibrutinib.2 Efficacy assessments included investigator-based PFS and ORR; sensitivity analyses were done to confirm PFS results. Data cut-off was 15 May 2023.2

A total of 652 evaluable patients were included in the study and were randomized to receive zanubrutinib (n=327) or ibrutinib (n=325). The median age was 67 in the zanubrutinib group and 68 in the ibrutinib group; a majority of patients had an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group status of 1 in both cohorts.2 At data cut-off (September 15, 2023), 59% of zanubrutinib-treated patients and 47% of ibrutinib-treated patients remained on therapy.2

At a median follow-up of 39 months, zanubrutinib continued to show superiority versus ibrutinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; P=.0011), with PFS rates of 64.9% with zanubrutinib and 54.8% with ibrutinib.2 The PFS benefits extended to other major subgroups, including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutations (HR, 0.52; P=.0047).2 Sensitivity analysis (included only progression and death events that occurred on active treatment) confirmed the PFS benefit of zanubrutinib (HR, 0.69; P=.0206).2 Zanubrutinib-treated patients achieved higher ORR compared to those treated with ibrutinib (90.2% vs 82.8%; P=.001).2 With longer follow-up, deeper responses were achieved with zanubrutinib and ibrutinib treatments in terms of CR/CRi (10.4% vs. 7.1%).2 The 36-month OS rates were similar in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib cohorts (82.5% vs 79.6%).2

In this extended follow-up, median treatment duration was 38.7 months in the zanubrutinib-treated cohort and 35 months in the ibrutinib-treated cohort.2 The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib therapies were adverse events (AEs; 19.8% vs 26.2%).2 In both zanubrutinib and ibrutinib cohorts, the most common AEs (any grade) were COVID-19, neutropenia, diarrhea, and upper respiratory tract infection.2 Grade ≥3 AEs were similar with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib; the most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (22.2% in both cohorts) and hypertension (16.4% vs 14.5%).2 Rates of serious AEs were lower with zanubrutinib therapy (50.9% vs 59%) compared with ibrutinib.2 Discontinuation rates due to cardiac disorders were lower with zanubrutinib (0.9% [n=3]) vs ibrutinib (4.6% [n=15]) and there were no fatal cardiac events with zanubrutinib (6 with ibrutinib).2 Compared to the ibrutinib cohort, the incidence of cardiac events was lower with zanubrutinib in most categories, including atrial fibrillation/flutter (6.8% [n=22] vs 16.4% [n=53]; P<.0001).2

Based on this extended follow-up data, it was concluded that zanubrutinib continued to show PFS benefits and more favorable cardiac safety profile compared to ibrutinib therapy in patients with R/R CLL/SLL, with emergence of no new safety signals.

Source:

  1. Brown JR, Eichhorst B, Hillmen P, et al. Zanubrutinib or ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:319-332.
  2. Brown J, Eichhorst B, Lamanna N, et al. Extended follow-up of ALPINE randomized phase 3 study confirms sustained superior progression-free survival of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib for treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (R/R CLL/SLL). Presented at the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition, December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA: Abstract 2023.

Related Items

Conference Correspondent Coverage is Brought to You by the Publishers of:
Journal of Hematology Oncology Pharmacy
Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship
The Oncology Pharmacist

Learn more about our family of publications.

View Our Publications